Monday, June 29, 2009

Punk me this! Writing a "punk" genre...



I write both steampunk and cyberpunk in addition to my paranormal and erotic romance stories but when I tell people that, even other authors, I'm often met with a confused look and a request to explain just what those genres are.

So, here's my own personal attempt to explain what they are in my own eyes. Keep in mind that there is no one true definition and some people may agree with me while others may not. So Your Mileage May Vary.

What are the "punk" genres?
The "punk" genres share a few things in common. One of these is that they are based on a technology or aspect of a technology that has been developed beyond where it ever was in the past or is currently. In steampunk, this means steam technology. In cyberpunk, it's computer and nano technology.

Steampunk is the most commonly found example so I tend to use it. In a steampunk world, the internal combustion engine may or may not have been developed. If it was developed, it wouldn't have taken over technologically. Instead steam engines would have been further developed, perhaps miniturized, etc.

The "punk" worlds also have in common the idea that form is as important of function. This is, in essence, the opposite of the common "beige box" computer. The aesthetics of the technology are important.

In steampunk, this often takes the form of fantastical machines or ones where the functionality of the machine is exposed to view. This can go as far as an almost Rube Goldberg contraption but can also be as simple as elegant finishing and engraving on a boot jack.

In cyberpunk, the aesthetics often take the opposite form. Instead of big fantastical machines that demonstrate their function, it tends to have disguised function. So think of a cybernetic arm where much of the function is hidden to look like a flesh and blood arm.

The other aspect is the richness of detail that makes or breaks the "punk" story. The charm and draw of the world is its minutia. Things are often described in detail and because it's a genre where you are writing about a world the reader doesn't know, it requires description in detail.

These really are the three basic ideas of a "punk" genre. There are things that are typically done with them like steampunk is often written as a historical. Cyberpunk is often written as a futuristic or science fiction. But I don't believe that is actually what makes the genre and it isn't a rule.

What does it take to write a "punk" genre?
Research. Really. If you hate to do research or don't want to do it, please reconsider taking on this type of story. Because the world depends on detail and if you cannot create a world where the reader believes in the technology or at least believes it might be possible, you will fail right out of the gate.

A richness of world building. If you hate to create big worlds with lots of detail, don't take up a "punk" genre. A good amount of success is that "punk" world.

Any "punk" genre also requires a descriptive voice. That same detail that makes the story a "punk" story has to be conveyed to the reader to draw them into the richness of the world. This can be quite difficult to balance with the other story aspects but shorting the reader on it will make the vibrant world go bland and flat.

A really good "punk" story requires a willingness to take chances. Chances with your world, your plot and even your characters. Don't just do what has gone before and has been labeled steampunk, cyberpunk, etc. Take the rules and play with them.

So that's my personal take on the various "punk" genres and writing them.

17 comments:

writtenwyrdd said...

Very useful, thanks. I shall link to this on my blog.

Leona said...

Thanks! When I learn how to link things from my blog (beyond the general page)I will start posting some of this usefule information. I'd never hear of the "punk" genre :) Sounds very intriguing. May have to try my hand at it for the 1k a day contest LOL

Maura Anderson said...

Thanks Written!

Leona - It can be a lot of fun but it's a challenge. I think it would great fun for a contest.

LauraT said...

More on SteamPunk... even though you are creating a world for it.. can it be futuristic (with a base of reality-- such as Earth History?) Are there any tv shows that are good "punkgenre" examples? Would FarScape be considered steampunk? So sorry for so many questions. I just heard about steampunk, and want to read it :) & check it out.
Are the rules for worldbuilding in steampunk already present- is there a base, or can you start from scratch and make your own? Or would that not be steampunk, and just fantasty?

Boy I hope I'm making sense LOL.

Maura Anderson said...

I think Farscape is considered Science Fiction/fantasy and not steampunk really. It does have some cross-over look & feel but if you go back to what technology is developed, it becomes technology we don't really have yet. That moves it.

I like to encourage people to look beyond what has already been written in steampunk and cyberpunk, especially and venture out on their own to create a different world using the premise of steam power developed to a new extent. There's no true "rules" that everyone can agree on.

Remember, though, that things like vampires differ too. They have something in common - a need to live off something they take from other living beings - but there's a huge range within that similarity.

I think if you go out of an earth-based history or world for your story, you are venturing into a realm more fantasy than steampunk.

Does that help at all? Remember that these are MY opinions, though, as an author and long-time reader of the genre. They are certain NOT to be everyone's opinions.

LauraT said...

Oh that helps a ton! Thanks! I really have been trying to figure it out for awhile, and this is the most clear explanation I've had :). I like your opinions on it, too :).

Debra Glass said...

Great post, Maura! I had wondered. The genre sounds fascinating. I can't wait to read one of your books!

Jane said...

My hubby is a big steampunk fan - when he finds a new book or story featuring it, he is a happy camper. Personally, I love the complicated nature of the steampunk contraptions, and I really enjoy it when there is a dollop of magic stirred in.

Kate Austin said...

I'm with Jane and her husband - I can remember when I first read Neal Stephenson's The Diamond Age (quite a few years ago) and how much I loved it. But I'm truly passionate about William Gibson, and that's definitely cyberpunk as opposed to steampunk. Very good explanation, Maura, because I read it rather than write it, I haven't thought it out that carefully.

Kate

Tori Lennox said...

As far as I can recall I've never actually read steampunk but I think I would love love LOVE it!

Maura Anderson said...

I love the big contraptions, too, Jane! I'm really looking forward to the Steam Con here in Seattle this year. Should be a great time!

Kate - I like William Gibson, too. He's considered steampunk because of the Difference Engine and the fact it's not integrated circuit or electric computing but I have heard other people call him cyberpunk. Danged good stories, nonetheless.

- Maura

Maura Anderson said...

It's a lot of fun, Tori!

ECSpurlock said...

As a devotee of Steampunk myself, I find the best way to describe it is by example. Classic Steampunk is the work of Victorian science fiction authors such as Jules Verne (the quintessential Steampunker!), HG Wells and H Rider Haggard. These were people envisioning the future using the technology they had at the time. For those not into the classics, check out The Golden Compass trilogy, and the Japanese anime films Steamboy and Steam Hunters, which do a passable imitation. Also, take inspiration from the "futuristic', organic visions of Art Nouveau and the Pre-Raphaelite vision of a neo-Gothic world. But Maura is right, to some extent Steampunk is what you make it, and can be very flexible in terms of time period or alternate reality. Cyberpunk, on the other hand, is pretty definitely fixed in a future or at least near-future setting.

librarypat said...

Didn't even know there was a punk genre. Your descriptions made sense, but I would have never projected them onto classic authors like Jules Verne and HG Wells. The definition does fit .

Candy Havens said...

I'm so glad you explained this. I've been really confused. I hear the terms a lot, and look them up, but you are the first person who helped me understand!

jaya said...

I remember you blog oftenly on because of the content makes very nice to read. Also I got some of the social networking website and online friends community website to get more friends for fun and entertainment to reach right destination about online friends.



Indian Friends Online Community


Social Network website


Make Money Online

ciarcullen said...

Lots and Lots of research. Which is why my steampunk isn't punk at all, but speculative time travel/romantic fantasy. I don't do the gadgets. So I settled on an alternate 1890. Still praying it works.